Airbnb is tightening its rules on checkout chores, saying hosts should make only “reasonable” requests of departing guests. The change sets a standard for the tasks hosts can ask guests to perform at the end of a stay, although the supplied details do not describe the previous policy. It raises the question of where to draw the boundary between asking visitors to leave a rental responsibly and asking them to help prepare accommodation for its next occupants.

The rules, unveiled this week, establish a standard for checkout requests, but the available details do not quantify their reach. The supplied information includes no count of affected properties or hosts, no measure of how frequently guests receive chore lists and no estimate of the time those requests consume. The central development is therefore a change in the platform’s stated expectations, not a measured reduction in guests’ workload. Its practical significance will depend on how the reasonableness standard is applied.

That distinction matters because limiting checkout chores is not necessarily the same as eliminating every request a host might make. Airbnb’s stated position leaves room for reasonable requests. It does not, in the supplied details, provide a complete list of permitted and prohibited tasks. The policy can consequently be described as a limit on hosts’ discretion, but not as evidence that guests will have no responsibilities when leaving a property or that every checkout instruction is now barred.

Read more: Saving for a starter home takes twice as long as in 2019

For guests, one practical question is where an ordinary departure request ends and cleaning work begins. The new standard is relevant to that division, although the available information does not establish a task-by-task boundary. Describing the change as a blanket prohibition on all work normally performed by cleaners would go beyond the detail provided. The narrower, supported conclusion is that Airbnb says hosts should keep checkout requests within a reasonable scope, without specifying in the supplied material which individual chores meet that test.

For hosts, the issue is how to reconcile their checkout instructions with that standard. A standard framed around reasonableness alone offers less specific guidance than a task-by-task checklist would: its practical meaning turns on which requests Airbnb accepts and which it regards as excessive. The available details do not establish how the company will assess that distinction. They also do not set out an enforcement process or identify penalties, leaving the operational consequences of the change less clear than its overall direction.

The considerations are straightforward, even without documented reactions from guests or property operators. Guests have an interest in understanding what a booking requires of them, including at departure; hosts have an interest in setting expectations for the use of their accommodation. Airbnb’s rule allows some scope for those expectations while setting a limit. Whether it produces a clearer division of responsibilities will turn on the interpretation of “reasonable”, rather than on the existence of the word alone.

Read more: Flight disruptions leave thousands of Indian Muslim pilgrims stranded in Saudi Arabia

The checkout change comes against the backdrop of a separate proposal on short-term rental regulation. In September, the European Commission proposed further restrictions on Airbnb and other short-term rental companies in tourist hubs. That proposal provides a wider policy backdrop for the platform’s operating changes. However, the available information does not establish that the Commission’s initiative prompted the checkout rules, and the two developments should not be treated as parts of a single regulatory measure or as having the same purpose.

Their stated scope is also different. Airbnb’s checkout standard concerns what hosts ask of guests at the end of a stay. The Commission’s proposal concerns restrictions on short-term rental companies in tourist destinations. The supplied details do not explain the proposed European restrictions further, so they cannot support conclusions about their effect on particular properties or markets. Nor do they establish that the checkout change answers the concerns behind the Commission’s proposal. The connection is context, not demonstrated causation.

There is similarly no basis in the supplied information for attaching a financial outcome to Airbnb’s announcement. The available information contains no figures for cleaning charges, accommodation prices or the cost of complying with the new standard. It would therefore be premature to describe the policy as a saving for guests or an added expense for hosts. The announcement sets out a limit on checkout requests; any effect on costs or the organisation of cleaning remains unquantified in the details provided.

The next question is how that limit translates into individual checkout instructions. Clear distinctions between acceptable requests and excessive chores would make the standard easier for both sides to understand, but no further timetable or implementation detail is supplied. For now, Airbnb’s message is that hosts should make only reasonable requests. That is a narrower conclusion than the wholesale disappearance of checkout responsibilities, but it establishes the stated principle for judging those requests.