France’s government bond sell-off is raising borrowing costs across the eurozone ahead of a European Central Bank meeting next week at which interest rates are expected to stay unchanged. The market-driven tightening adds a restraint on economic activity even without another policy move. It also puts the focus on whether France’s debt difficulties require a response from the central bank or, first, action by the French government.

The yield on France’s 10-year government bond traded above 5% on Friday, having reached that level on Wednesday. The rise comes with French debt at 119.1% of gross domestic product and budget negotiations offering little prospect of a rapid reduction in the deficit. Meanwhile, the ECB has increased rates twice this year, taking its deposit rate to 2.5%, while eurozone inflation jumped to 3.8% in September, driven by energy prices.

Those figures leave the ECB assessing tighter financial conditions alongside continuing price pressures. The expected pause would leave its policy rate unchanged, but would not prevent the bond market from adding to the pressure on growth. Christine Lagarde, the ECB president, told the European Parliament on 28 September that the notable rise in long-term rates would slow economic activity. Her assessment underlines why developments in government debt markets matter for the central bank’s next decision.

Read more: China’s stocks lose $3.5 trillion since May peak as profits weaken

Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at Dutch bank ING, estimated in an investor note on Thursday that the increase in German bond yields since September had an effect on growth and inflation roughly equivalent to a 25 basis point interest-rate increase. For France, he put the equivalent closer to 50 basis points. These are estimates of the economic effects of market movements, rather than additional policy-rate increases, but they illustrate the scale of tightening already taking place.

The comparison also highlights the uneven pressure within the eurozone. In Brzeski’s assessment, France faces a stronger market-imposed restraint than Germany, even though both fall under the same ECB interest-rate policy. His view is that bond markets are now performing some of the central bank’s tightening work. He expects policymakers to await fresh staff forecasts in December before deciding on their next increase.

The case for patience on rates is distinct from the question of support for French bonds. ECB officials have sought to temper expectations that they will step in to reduce France’s borrowing costs, without excluding intervention altogether. Lagarde has made clear that the initial response to France’s debt problems must come from Paris. With a quick deficit reduction looking unlikely in the current budget talks, the fiscal outlook remains central to the market’s concerns and the policy debate.

Read more: Japanese life insurers are net buyers of superlong government bonds for four months

Banque de France governor Emmanuel Moulin took a more explicit position last Friday, saying that the requirements for ECB intervention had not been satisfied because the eurozone was not experiencing financial fragmentation. That assessment distinguishes higher borrowing costs from a disruption that would warrant central-bank action. It also provides a counterpoint to the scale of the French yield rise: a substantial tightening in market conditions does not, in itself, establish that the ECB should buy bonds.

One potential route, if the ECB did decide to act, would be its Transmission Protection Instrument, or TPI. Established in 2022, the instrument has not been used. It permits purchases of a country’s debt when borrowing costs rise in a way the ECB considers unsupported by economic fundamentals and threaten the transmission of monetary policy across the eurozone. The framework therefore makes the reason for a yield increase important, not simply the level that yields reach.

The ECB has previously purchased government debt during the eurozone debt crisis to steady markets and preserve the transmission of its rate decisions to the economy. That history provides context for discussion of intervention, but not a commitment to repeat it in France. The country’s debt burden and the difficulty of securing a prompt deficit reduction remain relevant to assessing its borrowing costs. Brzeski regards TPI as a last-resort option should the disruption extend to other eurozone bond markets.

Next week’s meeting is consequently likely to draw attention to the ECB’s explanation of market conditions as much as its rate decision. Brzeski anticipates little policy action but significant communication. The immediate questions are how officials weigh bond-market tightening against elevated inflation, and whether Moulin’s assessment that intervention conditions were not met continues to hold. Beyond that meeting, December’s staff forecasts and France’s budget negotiations remain important reference points for the outlook for rates and government borrowing costs.