A shortage of available first-generation trophy offices is lifting effective rents and pushing more occupiers towards second-generation space, where rents are also rising. The shift highlights a supply constraint within the office market: tenants seeking trophy accommodation face limited available options, while the alternative space attracting their attention is becoming more expensive. Scarcity is therefore affecting both the accommodation occupiers initially seek and the space they turn to instead.

As of the Oct. Rents for second-generation space were up 10% annually as the lack of available trophy offices redirected occupiers. Those figures describe rental pressure across two connected categories, rather than establishing that both categories face a shortage. They also show that moving towards existing space does not necessarily mean escaping rising rents, although the two increases use differently stated comparison periods.

The central issue is the availability of the space occupiers want. The shortage of trophy offices is prompting tenants to consider second-generation accommodation, linking conditions in that category to constraints elsewhere in the market. This matters when interpreting the rental figures: the increase in second-generation rents is occurring alongside a shift in occupier interest caused by limited trophy availability. It is not simply a separate rental movement with no connection to the more constrained category.

Read more: North Korea reports tests of two submarine-launched cruise missile types

The figures nevertheless need to be read on their stated terms. The increase of more than 20% specifically concerns effective rents for first-generation trophy space, while the 10% annual increase is described as a rise in rents for second-generation space. No absolute rent levels accompany those changes. They therefore indicate the direction and reported pace of rental growth, but do not establish the price difference between the two categories or the saving an individual tenant might achieve by switching.

For occupiers, the emerging choice is consequently about availability as well as rent. Second-generation offices offer an alternative to scarce trophy space, but the rise in their rents means that this alternative is itself subject to upward pricing pressure. The movement towards existing accommodation may broaden the space tenants consider without removing the underlying challenge. On the evidence available, the shift is a response to constrained choice, not proof that occupiers have ceased to seek first-generation trophy offices.

For owners of second-generation space, the same movement points to an opportunity to attract occupiers whose preferred category has limited availability. Yet the reported rental increase does not establish that all existing offices are benefiting equally, or that every property can attract displaced demand. The distinction is important: the evidence concerns a shift towards second-generation accommodation and rising rents in that category. It does not support a claim that office properties generally are experiencing the same market conditions.

Read more: Japan denies espionage after Russia arrests Japanese journalist

Equity capital presents a further constraint. The assessment accompanying the rent figures identifies a current lack of equity flowing towards office supply and anticipates a supply-constrained market as a result. Its implication is that higher rents alone will not necessarily bring an immediate easing of availability. The capital observation adds a forward-looking element to the current shortage, although it does not specify how much additional space might be needed or when investment could respond.

That creates contrasting considerations for tenants and property owners. Occupiers face rising rents in both the scarce trophy category and the second-generation space to which they are turning. Owners may see stronger rental conditions, but the shortage of equity suggests that a supply response could remain constrained. These are different consequences of the same imbalance, rather than evidence of an uncomplicated recovery across offices. Rental growth in the categories described should not be treated as a complete account of the wider market.

The central question is whether additional availability can eventually relieve the pressure, or whether the movement towards existing space continues. The present figures establish neither a timetable for new supply nor a forecast for how far rents might rise. They do, however, identify the mechanism to watch: limited trophy availability is redirecting occupiers, and the receiving category is registering rental growth. Reading the figures together captures that connection rather than treating either rent figure in isolation.

For now, the reported direction is clear. Effective rents for first-generation trophy offices are rising sharply, second-generation rents are increasing as more occupiers consider that space, and limited equity capital weighs on the prospect of a supply response. The outlook accompanying the figures is for continued supply constraints and upward pressure on rents. Whether that pressure eases will depend on developments not yet established by the available evidence, particularly any change in availability and capital flowing towards supply.